🔗 Share this article

Last year, star Jude Law remarked he “didn’t fear any repercussions” for playing Vladimir Putin in a cinematic adaptation. The movie, though, may align too neatly with the carefully constructed image circulated by official channels that, within Russia, it reads as a endorsement rather than a critique.

The Crafted Strongman

For years, the Kremlin and its pop-culture machine have worked together to forge a tailor-made version of Putin. This character is an infallible strategist without age or mistakes, a former spy reframed as a local 007 who always knows more than he reveals.

“In Russia, the constructed Putin has long eclipsed the real one.”

Cinematic Reinforcement

A notable instance is a television show launched last fall, directed by a Kremlin supporter. Its main character is a invented blue-eyed lieutenant colonel inexplicably chosen to “save” Russia from chaos. While he is called a different name, the message is unmistakable: the savior must be a known figure from the secret services.

International depictions frequently result in buttressing this same narrative instead of undercutting it. A new film inspired by a bestselling satirical novel aims to undermine the leader's mythology by presenting him not as a cause but as a symptom, moving the narrative weight to the political machinery surrounding him.

The Fable of the Hesitant President

In the film, Putin is shown as having been picked by powerful oligarchs to stabilise the nation because he is “a fit former intelligence agent”. They visit him and all but beg him to become president. He replies is that he would prefer to rule from the background, desiring enduring influence.

This narrative is the Kremlin’s export myth: the detached, unwilling mastermind guided by fate. In reality, these events ever happened.

The Truth Behind the Selection

No one actually pleaded with Putin to take the job. The position was in essence a casting call with no shortage of candidates. At the centre to this process stood a powerful businessman from the Yeltsin era who planned to control the state de facto.

• The shortlist included various figures, among them an opposition leader later murdered and a security service director.
• Per an expert who studied his rise, the chosen candidate merely met the required parameters: obedient, from the intelligence world, and not a communist or a liberal.
• A property developer familiar with the process said the primary requirement was manageability and faithfulness, not strength.

“They didn’t need a powerful leader, they needed someone malleable, someone who would obey orders.”

Constructing the Spy Legend

Experts agree that the notion of Putin as a powerful KGB spy was constructed retrospectively. Claims about his clandestine activities in East Germany do not stand up to scrutiny. In essence, he was an administrator and routine duties, a low-level clerk not engaged in actual agent work.

Curiously, the shift to framing him as a “spy” may in part have been triggered by the actor's arrival as 007. The grittier version led local outlets and online audiences to make comparisons with Putin. Edited images replacing the actor's likeness with his appeared on Moscow streets, feeding the increasing trend to frame him as a local secret agent.

A Diplomatic Opportunity?

Given the casting, an star popular with Russian audiences, the authorities will not miss the chance to portray this choice as a minor diplomatic triumph. The film's exclusion of mass protests, the opposition, or key figures in the story, even though it includes recent years, is a welcome aspect for state propaganda.

Domestically, the president is frequently an omnipotent figure who never appears on screen. He is hinted at through photographs or calls “from above”. In this new film, he at last gets a recognizable face—one that could unintentionally echo the exact legends it perhaps aims to question.